Don’t go into HR because you like to work with people. Don’t look at building a career in HR just because you enjoy helping people or have great service orientation.
Don’t get me wrong – you should enjoy enabling people to grow, develop, find right roles and discover their own potential – All of which you can do as a people’s manager or even as a peer in organisations.
My belief is that build a career in HR when you believe that talent is a true differentiator in the marketplace and can help businesses succeed, just as much as innovation, financial management and great brand building.
At an early stage of my career, a peer had given me what I believe is invaluable advice – “In HR, chances of failures are greater than chances of successes. Don’t let that get you down!” While that was a bitter pill to swallow then, I do know this to be true now – HR requires a great amount of resilience and grit. There could be a variety of reasons why things don’t seem to work – speed of change, leadership alignment falling through, a star employee who could not be retained, etc. The resilience and mental strength to bounce back from challenges and failures would hold you through your HR career, and thus, my other tip for budding HR professionals who may be familiar with this notion that HR is for those who want a “relaxed, relatively stress-free career” – Please do believe that is far from reality and instead, we need to continually work on instilling our resilience
Several years ago, I worked on a leadership development program for mid management. The program was designed to enable high potential talent to take on assignments/projects that would solve the organisation’s biggest challenges and in turn build their muscles around strategy; leadership and innovation.
Fast forward to 2019, I was amazed to receive an email from one of the participants to express his gratitude to the team that put the program together – it had enabled him to change his career trajectory from a project manager to lead one of the largest and most innovative businesses of the firm. That stands out as an achievement for me because it validated my belief that there is something truly magical about achieving results through talent – by assessing talent, hiring and developing the right people and building amazing leaders who live the company values and drive the culture.
While I am on the path to understanding this myself, here are my learnings so far:
This being a behavioural science practice that I believe lends itself heavily to HR and L&D – The Nudge Theory. Made famous by Thaler and Sunstein’s seminal work by the same name, any behavioural change whether at an individual, team or org culture level requires nudges built into daily habits for positive reinforcement.
HR is riddled with repeatable transactions and query resolutions which can be easily streamlined via automation and robotics. Another avenue that is already in the horizon is people analytics and insights that can be immensely helpful in larger organizational policies design and implementation. However, I would like to believe that value addition of HR lies in talent spotting, coaching and development of leaders and developing an awesome culture – all of which defies predictability and repeatability, making it tougher for AI to perform.
As L&D professionals, we focus on leadership buy-in for trainings but sometimes we forget to do enough for either gaining people manager buy in or the participant buy in.
Gaining reporting manager buy in is challenging but critical for employees to attend and more importantly, benefit from the training. Ensuring that the manager is an active partner by seeking their views or expectations on the content, giving them a program summary to discuss with the participant and content to coach the team on a regular basis are ideal.
Quoting Josh Bersin, gaining participant buy-in requires placing learning in the “flow of work” – this goes beyond accessibility and instead focuses on, on-time prompt to learn using the platform or a device they are already using to perform. As we design training programs we need to think of the experience that the program would give the convenience of accessing the learning to cultivate participant buy-in.